Same workload comparison

Start with what this workload buys you

The same token mix is applied to each plan’s prices and model allowance. Check shared pools and time windows on the plan page.

Comparison example: 12,000 tokens/request · 83% cache read

Example workload (12,000 tokens/request)

Input
1,000
Cache read
10,000
Output
1,000
Cache write
0

02Prices and allowances

Keep prices, requests and plan windows in one evidence ledger

Expand the ledger to verify four token prices, cost per request, model allowance and theoretical requests for this workload.

Open prices, capacity and plan windows
Metric Command Code GOAT Step 3.5 Flash
Input / 1M$0.10
Cache read / 1M$0.0200
Output / 1M$0.30
Cache write / 1M$0.000000
Cost / request Recalculated $0.00060012,000 tokens/request
Model allowance Published $20Based on this model’s plan allowance
Requests / month Recalculated 33,333Estimated with the 12,000-token workload above
5-hour limit Published $14Plan window
Weekly limit Published $35Plan window
Monthly limit Published $70Plan window

03Official reference rows

The official reference behind each plan

Compare each provider’s reference token mix and published estimates below.

Command Code GOAT View the provider’s reference workload Based on the published request estimate
Step 3.5 Flash
Reference input / request800
Reference cache read / request50,000
Reference output / request200
Reference cache write / request0
Reference volume / request51,000
Cost per request$0.001140
Model monthly allowance$20
Published requests / month17,500
Published capacity / month892.5M
Capacity basisBased on the published request estimate
Calculation

Cost per request = add the four token classes after multiplying each by its price per 1,000,000 tokens.

floor($20 ÷ $0.001140) = 17,543

Official source: Command Code GOAT · Snapshot captured: 2026-09-06

04Artificial Analysis external scores

External benchmarks with their source version

Benchmarks are from Artificial Analysis. See the source version and matched model below.

intelligence26.0Intelligence rank: 223
codingNo dataCoding rank: No data
agenticNo dataAgentic rank: No data

Artificial Analysis · index 4.1 · data date 2026-09-04 · Step 3.5 Flash

Scores describe the model’s performance on the named benchmarks. Results on your own tasks also depend on tools, prompts and execution environment.