Same workload comparison

Start with what this workload buys you

The same token mix is applied to each plan’s prices and model allowance. Check shared pools and time windows on the plan page.

Comparison example: 12,000 tokens/request · 83% cache read

Example workload (12,000 tokens/request)

Input
1,000
Cache read
10,000
Output
1,000
Cache write
0

02Prices and allowances

Keep prices, requests and plan windows in one evidence ledger

Expand the ledger to verify four token prices, cost per request, model allowance and theoretical requests for this workload.

Open prices, capacity and plan windows
Metric OpenCode Zen Ling 3.0 Flash Fin Free
Input / 1MNo data
Cache read / 1MNo data
Output / 1MNo data
Cache write / 1MNo data
Cost / request Recalculated No data12,000 tokens/request
Model allowance Published Free / not meteredBased on this model’s plan allowance
Requests / month Recalculated Free / not meteredFree option; see usage conditions
5-hour limit Published Plan window
Weekly limit Published Plan window
Monthly limit Published Plan window

03Official reference rows

The official reference behind each plan

Compare each provider’s reference token mix and published estimates below.

OpenCode Zen View the provider’s reference workload No published reference profile; the site common workload is used instead
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin Free · Free
Reference input / request1,000
Reference cache read / request10,000
Reference output / request1,000
Reference cache write / request0
Reference volume / request12,000
Cost per requestNo data
Model monthly allowanceFree / not metered
Capacity basisNo published reference profile; the site common workload is used instead

Official source: OpenCode Zen · Snapshot captured: 2026-09-06

05Usage and billing note

Pricing conditions to keep in view

These model-level conditions change the estimate; the official plan document remains the source for plan rules.

OpenCode Zen: Free for a limited time; data collected during the free period may be used to improve the model.