Same workload comparison

Start with what this workload buys you

The same token mix is applied to each plan’s prices and model allowance. Check shared pools and time windows on the plan page.

Comparison example: 12,000 tokens/request · 83% cache read

Example workload (12,000 tokens/request)

Input
1,000
Cache read
10,000
Output
1,000
Cache write
0

02Prices and allowances

Keep prices, requests and plan windows in one evidence ledger

Expand the ledger to verify four token prices, cost per request, model allowance and theoretical requests for this workload.

Open prices, capacity and plan windows
Metric OpenCode Go Hy3
Input / 1M$0.14
Cache read / 1M$0.0350
Output / 1M$0.58
Cache write / 1M$0.000000
Cost / request Recalculated $0.00107012,000 tokens/request
Model allowance Published $60Based on this model’s plan allowance
Requests / month Recalculated 56,074Estimated with the 12,000-token workload above
5-hour limit Published $12Plan window
Weekly limit Published $30Plan window
Monthly limit Published $60Plan window

03Official reference rows

The official reference behind each plan

Compare each provider’s reference token mix and published estimates below.

OpenCode Go View the provider’s reference workload Based on the published request estimate
Hy3
Reference input / request830
Reference cache read / request71,500
Reference output / request295
Reference cache write / request0
Reference volume / request72,625
Cost per request$0.002790
Model monthly allowance$60
Published requests / month21,500
Published capacity / month1.6B
Capacity basisBased on the published request estimate
Calculation

Cost per request = add the four token classes after multiplying each by its price per 1,000,000 tokens.

floor($60 ÷ $0.002790) = 21,506

Official source: OpenCode Go · Snapshot captured: 2026-09-06

04Artificial Analysis external scores

External benchmarks with their source version

Benchmarks are from Artificial Analysis. See the source version and matched model below.

intelligence42.2Intelligence rank: 92
coding58.8Coding rank: 84
agentic31.4Agentic rank: 89

Artificial Analysis · index 4.1 · data date 2026-09-04 · Hy3

Scores describe the model’s performance on the named benchmarks. Results on your own tasks also depend on tools, prompts and execution environment.